Hey there, developer friend! 👋 Let’s talk about the worst part of CI/CD: waiting ages for your pipeline to install dependencies, rebuild the same files, and finally deploy. It’s like watching paint dry—except the paint is your productivity.
But what if I told you there’s a way to cut build times in half (or more) with a few simple tweaks? Spoiler: It’s all about dependency caching and avoiding redundant work. Let’s turn your sluggish pipeline into a speed demon.
Why Caching Matters: The Pain of Redundant Work
Imagine this:
- You push a tiny CSS fix.
- Your pipeline reinstalls all dependencies from scratch.
- It rebuilds the entire project.
- You wait 15 minutes for a 10-second change. 😤
The culprit? No caching. Every run starts from zero, wasting time and compute resources.
Step 1: Cache Dependency Managers
Most build times are eaten by dependency installation. Cache them!
Example: Node.js (npm/yarn)
# GitHub Actions
- name: Cache node_modules
uses: actions/cache@v3
with:
path: node_modules
key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }}
# GitLab CI
cache:
key: $CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG
paths:
- node_modules/
How it works:
- Key: Uniquely identifies the cache (e.g., OS + Node version + lockfile hash).
-
Path: The directory to cache (e.g.,
node_modules
,.venv
,.m2
).
Other Languages:
-
Python (pip): Cache
~/.cache/pip
or.venv
. -
Java (Maven/Gradle): Cache
~/.m2
or.gradle/caches
. -
Ruby (Bundler): Cache
vendor/bundle
.
Step 2: Cache Build Artifacts
Why rebuild everything when only one file changed?
Example: Frontend Builds (Webpack/Vite)
# GitHub Actions
- name: Cache build assets
uses: actions/cache@v3
with:
path: dist/
key: ${{ runner.os }}-build-${{ hashFiles('src/**') }}
# GitLab CI
cache:
key: build-$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG
paths:
- dist/
Pro Tip: Use hashFiles
to invalidate the cache when source files change.
Step 3: Multi-Stage Caching
Split your pipeline into stages and reuse caches across jobs:
# GitLab CI Example
stages:
- dependencies
- build
- test
install_deps:
stage: dependencies
script: npm install
cache:
key: $CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG
paths:
- node_modules/
policy: push # Upload cache for later stages
build:
stage: build
script: npm run build
cache:
key: $CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG
paths:
- node_modules/
- dist/
policy: pull # Reuse cache from dependencies stage
Why this rocks:
- Dependencies stage: Installs once, shares with all later jobs.
- No redundant work: Build/test jobs skip reinstalls.
Advanced Caching Strategies
- Fallback Caches: Use a base cache if no exact match exists.
# GitHub Actions
- name: Cache node_modules
uses: actions/cache@v3
with:
path: node_modules
key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }}
restore-keys: |
${{ runner.os }}-node-
- Parallel Job Caching: Share caches across parallel matrix jobs.
jobs:
test:
strategy:
matrix:
os: [ubuntu-latest, macos-latest]
cache:
key: ${{ matrix.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }}
- Ephemeral Caching: For monorepos, scope caches to subprojects.
key: frontend-${{ hashFiles('apps/frontend/package-lock.json') }}
Real-World Wins
-
Startup Saves 70% Build Time: Caching
node_modules
reduced their 10-minute pipeline to 3 minutes. - Enterprise Cuts Cloud Costs: Shared caches across 100+ microservices slashed monthly CI bills by 40%.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
-
Over-Caching: Don’t cache huge directories (e.g.,
build/
with binaries). -
Stale Caches: Use
hashFiles
to auto-invalidate when dependencies change. -
Ignoring Cache Policies: In GitLab,
pull-push
vs.pull
can make or break performance.
Your Action Plan
- Audit Your Pipeline: Find jobs reinstalling dependencies or rebuilding artifacts.
- Add Caching: Start with dependency managers (npm, pip, etc.).
- Measure & Iterate: Use CI analytics to track time saved.
Key Takeaways
- Cache dependencies: Stop reinstalling npm/pip/Gradle packages every time.
- Cache build artifacts: Reuse compiled code where possible.
- Share caches: Across stages, jobs, and even pipelines.
Final Thought: Caching isn’t just a “nice-to-have”—it’s the secret sauce to CI/CD efficiency. Your future self (and your teammates) will thank you for the extra coffee breaks. ☕
Hit a snag? Drop a comment below—let’s optimize together! 🛠️
This is a pretty good article!
If we go back to first principles — a lot of tools are built for incremental work; and what’s how they work in our workstations.
Most CI just starts work from scratch all
the time.
I’m biased because I felt this problem needed to be addressed more fundamentally — which is what we do at Namespace (namespace.so); cache volumes bring you that incrementality with little to no friction.
Most folks on Namespace see dramatic performance improvements because of that. Just like you did.