Why Monolithic Node.js Apps Fail at Scale (And How to Fix Them)
Alex Aslam

Alex Aslam @alex_aslam

About: Seasoned Software Engineer with 10+ years of experience in software development involving the project management, Team lead, Feature development and happy to collaborate.

Joined:
Dec 23, 2024

Why Monolithic Node.js Apps Fail at Scale (And How to Fix Them)

Publish Date: Jul 6
1 4

The Breaking Point

Our Node.js API was handling 5,000 requests per second (RPS) just fine—until one day, it wasn’t.

  • Latency spiked from 50ms to 2+ seconds
  • Database connections maxed out
  • Deployments took 15+ minutes

The culprit? A monolithic architecture that couldn’t scale.

After a painful rewrite, we learned why monoliths crumble under pressure—and how to avoid the same fate.


1. The 5 Reasons Monolithic Node.js Apps Fail

🚨 Problem #1: The Database Bottleneck

  • Single database = Contention under high load
  • No read/write separation = Queries block each other

Example:

// Monolith: All services hit the same DB
app.post('/orders', () => db.query('INSERT...'));
app.get('/analytics', () => db.query('SELECT...')); // Blocks writes!
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🚨 Problem #2: Uncontrolled Dependency Bloat

  • Giant node_modules (500MB+ is common)
  • One broken dependency = Entire app crashes

🚨 Problem #3: Inefficient Scaling

  • Vertical scaling only (bigger servers, not more servers)
  • No isolation = A bug in one feature takes down everything

🚨 Problem #4: Slow Deployments

  • 15-minute CI/CD pipelines (testing the whole monolith)
  • Riskier releases (can’t deploy features independently)

🚨 Problem #5: Team Collisions

  • 10+ developers constantly merging into one codebase
  • Merge hell = "Who broke the tests?!"

2. How We Fixed It: The Microservices Transition

Step 1: Decoupled the Database

  • Orders DB (PostgreSQL)
  • Analytics DB (TimescaleDB)
  • Caching layer (Redis)

Step 2: Split the Monolith

Before:
monolith/
  ├── orders.js
  ├── analytics.js
  └── auth.js

After:
services/
  ├── orders/ (Fastify + PostgreSQL)
  ├── analytics/ (h3 + TimescaleDB)
  └── auth/ (Express + Redis)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Step 3: Adopted Kubernetes

  • Auto-scaling per service (not the whole app)
  • Isolated failures (orders down ≠ auth down)

Results:

Latency dropped back to 60ms at 10K RPS
Deployments now take <2 minutes
Teams deploy independently


3. When to Stick with a Monolith

Early-stage startups (speed > scale)
Simple apps (CRUD APIs with low traffic)
Small teams (1-3 devs)


Key Takeaways

🔹 Monoliths fail when:

  • Traffic grows
  • Teams expand
  • Databases choke

🔹 Microservices help when:

  • You need independent scaling
  • Teams own features end-to-end
  • Zero-downtime deploys matter

🔹 But don’t over-engineer! Start monolithic, split only when needed.

Have you hit scaling walls with Node.js? How did you solve it?


Further Reading

Comments 4 total

  • david duymelinck
    david duymelinckJul 7, 2025

    Problem 1 fix: use different database instances for different parts of the application.
    Problem 2 fix: use a load balancer and multiple application servers
    Problem 5 fix: separate team responsibilities and communicate when working outside the responsibilities.

    These problems are not a monolith problems.
    You can make a monolith work with complex websites and many developers.
    These are just very low thresholds to have an excuse to move to microservices because that is the "cool" tech.

    • Alex Aslam
      Alex AslamJul 7, 2025

      You make great points! A well-architected monolith can scale, we’ve seen it work with database partitioning, load balancing, and strong team coordination. The challenge is that many teams (including ours early on) don’t implement these patterns until after hitting walls.

      Microservices aren’t a magic fix, but they do force separation of concerns upfront. Curious, what’s the most complex monolith you’ve seen work well at scale?

      • david duymelinck
        david duymelinckJul 8, 2025

        I was thinking about it, and I find most complex monolith hard to define. So I can't give you an straight answer.

        I think the complexity is in choosing the right scaling method for the project or bottleneck(s). We have a lot of tools at out disposal, but picking the wrong one for the task can lead to troubles somewhere else.

        • Alex Aslam
          Alex AslamJul 17, 2025

          Totally agree, there's no one-size-fits-all answer. The real art is diagnosing bottlenecks early and choosing the right scaling strategy without overcomplicating things. Sounds like you've got a pragmatic approach. Have you found any heuristics that help guide these decisions for your projects?

Add comment