🧠 From Newton to Einstein to Neural Nets: Rethinking Gravity Through the Eyes of Software Engineering
Alireza Minagar

Alireza Minagar @alireza_minagar_99f01ecb6

About: MD, MBA, MS | Neurologist exploring software engineering, AI in medicine, and bioinformatics | Bridging clinical insight with emerging health tech

Location:
Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
Joined:
May 15, 2025

🧠 From Newton to Einstein to Neural Nets: Rethinking Gravity Through the Eyes of Software Engineering

Publish Date: Jun 11
0 1

By: Alireza Minagar, MD, MBA, MS (Bioinformatics) Software Engineer

Image description
When Isaac Newton described gravity, he gave us a world of absolutes—mass, force, and deterministic pull. His laws were elegant, mechanical, and intuitive.

Then came Einstein. He shattered that certainty with curved spacetime, non-linearity, and relativity. Suddenly, gravity wasn’t a force—it was geometry.

As a software engineer working in AI, I see something eerily similar in how we write code and build intelligence today.

Newtonian Coding: Rules, Logic, Determinism
Classical programming is Newtonian.

Inputs → deterministic rules → outputs.

We debug with reason, control flow like gravity, and expect predictable behavior.

Einsteinian Coding: Deep Learning, Probabilistic Logic
AI models, especially large neural nets, are Einsteinian.

Instead of if-else statements, we curve the “space” of data using layers and weights.

Inputs are distorted through latent space; outputs are probabilistic, not exact.

🧬 Just as Einstein replaced force with curvature, AI replaces logic with learned structure.

🔄 The Parallel is Profound
| Physics | Software Engineering |
| --------------------- | --------------------------- |
| Newtonian mechanics | Rule-based systems |
| Einstein's relativity | Deep learning architectures |
| Gravity as force | Logic as deterministic code |
| Curved spacetime | Latent space in neural nets |

👨‍🚀 Why This Matters
We are transitioning—from rule-based programming to model-driven intelligence, just as physics transitioned from Newton to Einstein.

To build next-gen software, we must think less like Newton and more like Einstein:

  • Accept uncertainty.
  • Embrace curvature.
  • Architect for adaptability.

Maybe the future of software isn’t a set of rules—it’s a warped field shaped by data, where intelligence simply “falls” into place.
Would Newton understand GPT-4? Would Einstein?

Let me know what you think.

AI #SoftwareEngineering #Physics #Einstein #NeuralNetworks #DevTo #LatentSpace #ArtificialIntelligence #CodePhilosophy

Disclosure: 🖼️ Image generated using ChatGPT (DALL·E) to illustrate the fusion of AI, gravity, and classical physics.

Comments 1 total

  • Richard
    RichardJun 11, 2025

    Hi there! unlock your easy $15 in DuckyBSC airdrop tokens right now! — Be part of the airdrop! Sign with wallet to verify and claim. 👉 duckybsc.xyz

Add comment