🧠 How Market Making Impacts Overall Market Liquidity — My Take
Vlad Anderson

Vlad Anderson @anderson_vlad

About: Digital Reporter | Digital Marketing Specialist | Top Web3 Writer in HackerNoon | Specialize in writing articles about Web3, crypto, blockchain |

Joined:
Jan 9, 2024

🧠 How Market Making Impacts Overall Market Liquidity — My Take

Publish Date: Jun 4
0 0

Let’s break it down without the fluff.

Market making isn’t just bots placing bids and asks. It’s the engine powering healthy markets — tightening spreads, absorbing volatility, and boosting confidence for both retail and institutional player, especially in major assets like $BTC.

But here’s the catch: not all market makers are equal. Some genuinely support organic trading by constantly quoting both sides. Others are there to farm fees or manipulate depth — especially on low-cap tokens or shady venues.

📊 True liquidity means you can enter and exit without big slippage. That’s where top-tier market making programs come in, offering solid incentives to keep markets deep and stable.

Here’s a quick look at some leading programs:
🟩 Binance offers 0% maker fees on selected pairs (top 75% performers), performance-based rebates up to 0.005%, plus higher API limits on request.

🟩 WhiteBIT gives maker rebates up to -0.010% on spot and -0.020% on futures, with perks like subaccounts, colocation, flexible API access, VIP support, and personalized terms for top makers.

🟩 Bybit provides up to 0.005% rebates on spot and derivatives, a 1-month trial for newcomers, and a maker volume share model to qualify.

💡 My advice? Don’t just chase numbers. A token can look liquid, but real traders check execution quality and depth. Trust transparent, performance-driven MM programs — they’re key for sustainable market health.

Comments 0 total

    Add comment