Building APIs is easy. Building APIs that don’t break is hard.
When I started developing my customer churn prediction API, I quickly ran into the classic pitfalls: manual validation scattered across endpoints, inconsistent error messages, and the ever-dreaded runtime crashes from malformed data.
Every new feature or endpoint meant more boilerplate checks and more places for bugs to sneak in.
Before Pydantic:
Manual validation in every endpoint: Each route had its own ad-hoc checks for types, missing fields, and value ranges.
Inconsistent error messages: Sometimes users got a helpful message, sometimes just a 500 error.
Runtime crashes: A single bad input could take down the whole prediction flow.
After Pydantic:
Validation wasn’t an afterthought—it was baked into the API’s core.
Here’s the heart of my simple validation logic:
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import Optional
from datetime import date
class dataval(BaseModel):
user_id: Optional[int] = None
city: int
gender: str
registered_via: int
payment_method_id: int
payment_plan_days: int
actual_amount_paid: int
is_auto_renew: int
transaction_date: date
membership_expire_date: date
With this single class, every endpoint that accepts user data gets:
Automatic Validation: Type checking and format validation happen before my code runs.
Clear Error Messages: If a user sends bad data, they get a precise, human-readable error—no more cryptic 500s.
Self-Documenting API: FastAPI auto-generates OpenAPI docs, showing exactly what’s expected.
IDE Support: My editor now autocompletes fields and warns me about mistakes.
The Result:
Since switching to Pydantic, I’ve had zero runtime crashes from invalid input data. Users get helpful feedback, and I spend less time debugging and more time building features. The API is easier to maintain, and onboarding new developers is a breeze—they can see the data model at a glance.
Lesson Learned:
Good API design isn’t about flashy features—it’s about handling edge cases gracefully and making failure modes predictable.




You can also try with ApidogLet's see how Apidog could directly address these problems (especially if Pydantic isn't in the picture):
Manual Validation in Every Endpoint: The more people have to validate then we are bound to make mistake!
Here Apidog would work is that:
If you are to load OpenAPI in your API, then it will generate many test cases to test! We will be able to test to see what is the right values! No longer will you have to code tests every-time you release code.
Consistency by not having people!
Apidog forces documentation! We all know dev does not do a good job in it and are not forced. With APIs being document, there are less errors and more understandability!
Overall Test and Automation:
After a few months of working to test APIs, we can now know how a program code needs to look! In any error, it would all crash! With apidog and automation testing, you can have a robust and test system running. This is so there won't be any downtime and easy testing!