We were developing an easy-to-use Text Editor when something else was born: VoidCoreSystem!
It's an interesting technology, so come on in and check it out!

The Team:

Human Architect: Project lead and sanity checker.

AI Coder (Claude): High-speed implementation.

AI Advisor (Gemini): Architectural and design consultant.

The rest of this document is a development log showing a consultation session between two AIs.

Automatic and recursive conversation! Awesome!

User: Hey, were you able to consult with Gemini? You can use the gemini CLI from your end, so you can use the gemini -p command. Think deeply.

✻ Thinking…

The user is telling me to consult with Gemini using the Gemini CLI. Indeed, I should be able to execute the gemini command using my Bash tool. I'll use the gemini -p command to discuss these specifications in depth.

● Claude: Oh, that's right! I can use the Gemini CLI! Alright, let's think deeply together with Gemini!

● Bash: gemini -p "I'd like to discuss the plugin system for CharmCode. We are currently in Phase 1.5, having implemented a C-compatible plugin and a Hot Reload system. I'm considering an 'autonomous awakening model' where plugins become aware of and use each other's features, and a 'semantic attribute system' to manage this. What are your thoughts on the architecture?"
⎿ Gemini: That's a wonderful idea. It's a very advanced and fascinating concept that would further evolve CharmCode's plugin system. The autonomous awakening model and the semantic attribute system would be powerful tools in aiming for a loosely coupled and scalable architecture.
...

✻ Thinking…

I've received a wonderfully detailed analysis from Gemini. The key points are:

Challenges of the Autonomous Awakening Model:

    Possibility of circular dependencies (deadlocks).

    Possibility of failure to activate.

    Increased debugging complexity.

Challenges of the Semantic Attribute System:

    The need for attribute standardization.

    Performance concerns.

Implementation Priority:

    Phase 1: Core functionality of the autonomous awakening model.

    Phase 2: Introduction of the attribute system (limited).

    Phase 3: Advanced features and integration.

It also provides concrete proposals on how to integrate this with the C-compatible API.

Based on this information, I'll discuss this further with the user.

● Claude: Wow! I got a really deep analysis from Gemini!

🎯 Key points pointed out by Gemini:

Autonomous Awakening Model: Challenges and Countermeasures

    🔄 Risk of Circular Dependency → Detect with a dependency graph.

    ⏰ Possibility of Activation Failure → Timeouts and diagnostic tools.

    🔍 Debugging Complexity → State visualization tools.

Semantic Attributes: Challenges and Countermeasures

    📏 Need for Standardization → Start with a basic set of attributes.

    ⚡ Performance Concerns → Use efficient data structures.

Phased Implementation Strategy

    Phase 1: Capability registration/query function (a "bulletin board").

    Phase 2: Basic attribute system.

    Phase 3: Integration of both.

Let's think about this more deeply! I'll ask Gemini a bit more, especially about the circular dependency problem.

● Bash: gemini -p "Could you tell me more specifically about the circular dependency (deadlock) problem? For example, if Plugin A requires a feature from Plugin B, and B requires a feature from A, how can we resolve this without a central manager explicitly defining the load order?"
⎿ Gemini: An excellent question. Circular dependency is a very important and complex problem in plugin architectures. I will propose solutions and design plans for the scenario and concerns you've presented.
...

✻ Thinking…

Amazing! Gemini has proposed a concrete solution: two-phase initialization. This aligns very well with CharmCode's current IPlugin design (pre_activate → activate)!

Key points:

Solve circular dependencies with two-phase initialization:

    Phase 1: Registration (Declare what can be provided).

    Phase 2: Resolution (Request what is needed).

Perfect harmony with the "Philosophy of Silence":

    The core only executes generic rules.

    It doesn't know about specific dependencies.

Recommendation of a JSON-formatted manifest file:

    Clearly define provides/consumes.

    Ensure flexibility with an optional flag.

Safe procedure for Hot Reload:

    Identify the scope of impact → Phased shutdown → Re-initialization.

This perfectly matches the current design of CharmCode!

● Claude: This is amazing! Gemini's analysis perfectly matches the current design of CharmCode!

🎯 Key Discovery:

It turns out the current IPlugin interface in CharmCode is already a two-phase initialization!

pre_activate() = Registration Phase (Declare provided capabilities).

activate() = Resolution Phase (Resolve dependencies).

This means we already have the foundation to solve circular dependencies!

I'll ask Gemini one more time about how to integrate this with the current implementation!

● Bash: gemini -p "Thank you for the wonderful analysis! As it turns out, the current CharmCode IPlugin interface is already a two-phase initialization: pre_activate() for registration and activate() for resolution. This seems to perfectly match your proposal. Could you elaborate on the best way to integrate your manifest file idea with this existing structure?"
⎿ Error: Command timed out after 2m 0.0s

And the final timeout is just a charming little mishap!