Introduction: Why the IDP Approach Matters
Internal developer platforms (IDPs) are becoming essential for scaling modern software delivery. They promise faster deployments, stronger governance, and consistent environments. Yet, many fail before they deliver value—often because they start with the portal and leave infrastructure for later.
This article compares Backstage (portal-first) and Pulumi IDP (infrastructure-first) so you can choose an approach that avoids common platform engineering pitfalls. Our in-depth analysis reveals why this architectural choice matters more than you might think.
Key Differences at a Glance
Backstage (Portal-First):
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Setup Time | 12-18 months |
| Maintenance | 3-5 FTEs ongoing |
| Focus | Service catalogs, documentation, templates |
| Infrastructure | Requires separate tooling (Terraform, Crossplane, etc.) |
| Best For | Teams with existing infrastructure automation |
Pulumi IDP (Infrastructure-First):
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Setup Time | Hours to days (Get started here) |
| Maintenance | Minimal ongoing overhead |
| Focus | Governance, security, cost control built-in |
| Infrastructure | Native infrastructure-as-code included |
| Best For | Teams needing fast, governed infrastructure delivery |
Why Infrastructure-First Matters for IDPs
With Gartner predicting that 80% of enterprises will deploy IDPs by 2026, the foundation you choose will impact cost, security, and delivery speed. Infrastructure-first platforms like Pulumi IDP embed:
- Policy enforcement from day one (no retroactive compliance scrambles)
- Cost awareness for efficient scaling (prevent cloud bill surprises)
- Security and compliance without bolt-on tools
- Cloud-native readiness for Kubernetes and multi-cloud environments
The Hidden Costs of Portal-First Platforms 💸
Backstage excels at developer portals, but its portal-first model can lead to:
- Long implementation timelines before developers see value
- High maintenance costs and staffing requirements
- Infrastructure governance added late, creating compliance debt
- Scaling challenges in Kubernetes-native environments
- Tool sprawl: Often requires 6+ additional tools for complete functionality
Real Developer Experience:
Portal-First Journey:
- Month 1-6: Set up Backstage portal
- Month 6-12: Integrate with existing tools
- Month 12+: Realize you need infrastructure automation
- Month 18+: Finally delivering value (maybe)
Infrastructure-First Journey:
- Day 1: Deploy platform with built-in governance
- Week 1: Developers provisioning compliant infrastructure using reusable components
- Month 1: Add portal features as needed with developer portals
- Continuous value delivery from day one
Community Insights 🗣️
Based on discussions in platform engineering communities:
"We spent 18 months on Backstage only to realize we still needed to build all the infrastructure automation separately." - Platform Engineer at Fortune 500
"Pulumi IDP got us from zero to production-ready platform in 2 weeks. The built-in governance saved us from compliance nightmares." - DevOps Lead at Scale-up
Learn more about real-world platform engineering experiences and how teams made their transitions.
Choosing the Right IDP for Your Organization
Select Backstage if you:
- Already have robust infrastructure provisioning and governance tools
- Primarily need a service catalog and documentation portal
- Have budget and staffing for long-term maintenance
- Want maximum customization flexibility
- Prefer open-source, community-driven solutions
Select Pulumi IDP if you:
- Need infrastructure governance from day one with CrossGuard policies
- Want to minimize setup time and operational overhead using the Automation API
- Require scalable, secure, multi-cloud infrastructure without starting from scratch
- Need built-in cost controls and policy enforcement
- Want to deliver value to developers immediately with organization templates
The Architecture That Scales
The fundamental difference isn't about features—it's about architecture:
Portal-First: Portal → Templates → (Eventually) Infrastructure → (Maybe) Governance
Infrastructure-First: Infrastructure + Governance → APIs → Portal → Enhanced DevEx
Dive deep into the architectural implications and see how real teams made their choice. You can also explore Pulumi's approach to platform engineering and how it aligns with the CNCF Platform Maturity Model.
Real-World Implementation Examples
Want to see how this works in practice? Check out these resources:
- For AWS users: Building an IDP on AWS with Pulumi
- For Kubernetes teams: Deploy production-ready clusters with Pulumi's EKS components
- Policy examples: Implement compliance-ready policies for your organization
- Workshop series: Join the Platform Engineering workshop series to get hands-on experience
Conclusion: It's About Your Foundation
The choice between Backstage and Pulumi IDP is more than a tool decision—it's an architectural decision that will impact your platform engineering success for years. Portal-first platforms can be powerful but risky without a strong infrastructure layer. Infrastructure-first platforms like Pulumi IDP ensure governance, security, and scalability from the start.
Your platform's foundation determines its future. Choose wisely.
💬 Discussion Time!
What's your experience with IDPs? Have you tried portal-first or infrastructure-first approaches? Share your platform engineering journey in the comments!
Want the complete analysis? Read our comprehensive comparison with real-world examples, cost breakdowns, and migration strategies.
Ready to get started? Explore the Pulumi IDP documentation or try the free Platform Engineering guide.
Follow me for more platform engineering insights!