From Statistical Evidence to Executable Data Graphs

From Statistical Evidence to Executable Data Graphs

Publish Date: Mar 3
1 0

Most enterprises don’t lack data.

They lack verified structure.

We’ve all seen relationship diagrams in slide decks. They look clean. They make sense. But they are descriptive — not executable.

In practice, data relationships drift:

· Foreign keys are incomplete

· Naming conventions change

· Cross-system links go undocumented

So the real question becomes:

How do you move from “assumed relationships” to verified, machine-readable structure?

At Arisyn, we approach this from the data itself.

Instead of relying on metadata, we analyze value behavior:

· null_row_num to understand field completeness

· distinct_num to evaluate domain uniqueness

· co_occure and inclusion_ratio to detect structural inclusion

If 90%+ of distinct values in one column appear in another, we don’t treat that as coincidence. We treat it as a structural inclusion signal

From there, relationships are not drawn as diagrams.

They are returned as structured JSON:

· source_table

· source_column

· target_table

· target_column

Each edge is statistically validated.

That JSON graph is executable.

It can generate JOIN paths.
It can support multi-hop traversal.
It becomes infrastructure.

Diagrams explain relationships.

Executable graphs enforce them.

And once relationships are machine-readable, AI stops guessing — and starts operating within constraints.

That’s the shift.

Comments 0 total

    Add comment