For decades, SQL has been the backbone of data querying. But as machine learning and natural language interfaces become more mainstream, a growing number of teams are asking: Can we make our accounting systems smarter than traditional SQL allows?

The answer lies in vectorizing structured accounting data.

In this article, we’ll explore why product managers and engineering leads should consider vectorization for structured accounting data — especially in the age of AI. You’ll learn how it works, how to implement it, and how it opens doors that SQL simply can’t.

1. Why Vectorization Outperforms Rules and SQL

Structured accounting data (invoices, journal entries, bills, etc.) maps beautifully to relational databases. But traditional SQL querying has limitations:

• Exact matching bias: SQL excels at filtering exact matches (e.g., WHERE customer_name = 'Acme Deli'), but fails to capture similar or fuzzy concepts (Acme Grocery, Acme Delicatessen).
• Hard to express intent: Queries must be defined rigidly in WHERE clauses, often requiring joins and manual filters.
• Doesn’t scale for semantic similarity: You can’t easily find invoices “similar” to another invoice, or rank customers by similarity without custom logic.
• Poor support for unstructured or semi-structured text: Freeform text, misspellings, abbreviations, and varied naming conventions make SQL filtering brittle.

Vectorization turns these rigid fields into mathematical representations in n-dimensional space:

• Each record becomes a point in space
• Similarity becomes a geometric problem (e.g., cosine similarity)
• You can compare multiple dimensions — numeric, date-based, and textual — in a unified framework

Unlike rules, which are deterministic and require explicit programming, vectors allow implicit pattern recognition. Vectors support nearest neighbor search algorithms such as HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small Worlds), which can perform sub-linear time lookups over large sets of multidimensional data. This makes vectorization vastly more scalable for tasks like:

• Identifying similar transactions
• Recommending vendors or accounts
• Ranking entries by relevance to user input

With high-dimensional vectors (e.g., 768 to 1536 dimensions), the space of possible meanings is more finely grained, allowing richer and more intuitive similarity comparisons than what even the most complex SQL query could express.

2. Hybrid Vectorization: Example of a Purchase

Most accounting transactions are multi-modal: they include numbers, dates, entities, and freeform text. A hybrid vectorization strategy lets you turn each part of the record into vector components:

Example: Purchase Transaction (JSON)

{
  "vendor": "Staples Inc.",
  "amount": 452.80,
  "date": "2024-06-01",
  "category": "Office Supplies",
  "items": [
    {"name": "Printer Paper", "qty": 5, "unit_price": 8.99},
    {"name": "Stapler", "qty": 1, "unit_price": 14.99}
  ],
  "memo": "Monthly supplies"
}

Vectorization Process:

• Numeric fields: Directly encode values (e.g., amount, quantity).
• Dates: Convert to days since epoch, or use sinusoidal encodings to capture seasonality.
• Items: Aggregate statistics (e.g., item count, avg. unit price), or embed each product name individually.
• Text fields (vendor, memo): Use embeddings like OpenAI’s text-embedding-3-small.

Example Vector (simplified):

[
  452.80,               # amount
  17,                   # days since purchase
  2,                    # item count
  9.29,                 # average unit price
  ...vendor embedding...  # dense vector of 1536 floats
  ...memo embedding...    # dense vector of 1536 floats
]

This vector captures both the structured and semantic nature of the purchase. You can now:

• Find similar purchases
• Recommend categories
• Cluster transactions
• Detect anomalies

📊 Vector Space Diagram

+-------------------------------------+
|                                     |
|        ● Invoice A                 |
|      /                              |
|     /    ● Invoice B               |
|    /      \                        |
|   /        \                       |
|  ● Query     ● Invoice C           |
|                                     |
+-------------------------------------+

This diagram shows a simplified 2D vector space. The closer two points are, the more similar their records are. In real-world applications, vectors have hundreds or thousands of dimensions.

3. Storing and Retrieving Vectors

Once vectorized, the data must be stored in a way that supports fast similarity search. You have several architectural options:

🔹 Vector Databases

Purpose-built for similarity search, supporting approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search:

• Examples: Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus
• Benefits: Auto-scaling, indexing, metadata filters, and native LLM integration

🔹 Analytics Platforms and Lakehouses

• Examples: Databricks with MLflow and Delta Lake
• Use Case: Large-scale ML pipeline integration with support for embedding storage, distributed compute, and batch inference

🔹 In-memory Vector Search

• Examples: FAISS, HNSW libraries
• Use Case: Local vector search, prototyping, or offline inference

When choosing a storage mechanism, consider:

• Indexing: Fast ANN indexes (HNSW, IVF) for speed
• Metadata filtering: Combine vector similarity with field-level filters (e.g., vendor = Staples)
• Dimensionality: Larger vectors may require more RAM and compute
• Integration: Choose systems that fit your existing ML/data stack

4. Intent Detection and Query Understanding

One of the most powerful use cases for vectorization is pairing it with LLM-powered intent understanding. Let’s walk through the process:

🧠 Step 1: Capture User Intent

User input:

"Show me trends for Staples Inc."

Use OpenAI’s GPT model to extract structured intent:

{
  "intent": "trend_analysis",
  "target_field": "vendor",
  "target_value": "Staples Inc."
}

🧩 Step 2: Vectorize the Query

Use the same embedding model used on the vendor field to embed "Staples Inc."
Then, compare to precomputed vendor vectors to find the closest match (handling typos or variants).

📊 Step 3: Retrieve and Analyze Data

Use the matched vendor to query related transactions:

• Retrieve purchases from the last 12 months
• Aggregate by month
• Return insights, graphs, or summaries

🔄 Full Workflow Diagram

[User Query]
     ↓
[LLM → Extract Intent]
     ↓
[Vectorize Target Value]
     ↓
[Nearest Neighbor Search]
     ↓
[Retrieve Related Records]
     ↓
[Aggregate + Visualize Trends]

This enables natural-language, intelligent querying over accounting systems — without the user needing to know SQL.

Final Thoughts

While SQL is foundational to accounting systems, vectorization unlocks a new class of intelligent capabilities. From fuzzy matching to intent-driven queries and LLM integration, it empowers you to build systems that truly understand your data.

By combining structured rules with flexible vector space reasoning, teams can modernize their financial applications — making them smarter, faster, and more user-friendly.

Let's Connect
LinkedIn