What's your favorite Git tool?
kimdontdoit

kimdontdoit @kimdontdoit

About: Currently Frontin’

Location:
Canada
Joined:
Jan 16, 2022

What's your favorite Git tool?

Publish Date: Jan 25 '22
3 18

What's your favorite Git tool/GUI or is the command line all you need?

I've had enough of SourceTree crashing on me (Mac 😤) so much that it pushed me to write my first #discuss post on dev.to

Sourcetree quit unexpectedly

Sourcetree quit unexpectedly for daysss

Comments 18 total

  • kimdontdoit
    kimdontdoitJan 25, 2022

    You may laugh at me, but what I found works best for me at the moment is a mix of Sourcetree, command line and VS Code's Git Lens, depending of what I'm doing

    In my daily workflow, I find using a desktop GUI is especially useful to .. well .. visually compare and diff branches. Will switching to command line and getting used to it make me a better developer?

    I've also tried Git Kraken and Github Desktop, but found limitations in both of them for my use cases. Looking to try Git Fork which was mentioned around here next.

    • TheAwesomeGuy47
      TheAwesomeGuy47Jan 26, 2022

      Will switching to command line and getting used to it make me a better developer?

      Yes, it will. I used to use GitHub Desktop but I found that it had less capabilities than what the command line had once I switched to it. Also, being trained in the command line is good and will help you in the developer journey.

      • kimdontdoit
        kimdontdoitJan 26, 2022

        Github Desktop is pretty but quite unusable, I'm not sure who the audience for it was. The answers and my experience seem to align with what you recommend though "DROP THE GUI" ✂️

  • Corentin Bettiol
    Corentin BettiolJan 25, 2022

    I use the git program from the command line, and sometimes the diffs in vscode.

  • Chad Adams
    Chad AdamsJan 26, 2022

    Built in git from VSCode 🙂

  • Richard Guay
    Richard GuayJan 26, 2022

    I’ve been using gitui. It’s fast and easy to use. It’s a terminal base program, but has all the gui features you would need.

    • kimdontdoit
      kimdontdoitJan 26, 2022

      Interesting. They seem to emphasize on performance and this also caught my eye on their repo, which I think most would agree with 😂 :

      Unfortunately popular git GUIs all fail on giant repositories or become unresponsive and unusable.

  • FJones
    FJonesJan 26, 2022

    Exclusively CLI here, with no plugin tools. Git Bash on Windows, naturally.
    Since I very often do bisects for tracing, manual repair of branches, and complex rebase/merge operations, I've found GUIs to be subpar.

    • TheAwesomeGuy47
      TheAwesomeGuy47Jan 26, 2022

      Same as my experience. Git on the command line is and will be superior for a while to come.

      • FJones
        FJonesJan 26, 2022

        Depends on your needs, really. A regular dev just concerned with merges and pull/merge requests is fine using GUI or web tools. More intuitive for them, or easier to handle (had a coworker use our Gitlab for merges even to the staging and integration branches). But bisect and rebase -i are important tools for power users, especially those with responsibility, and no GUI I've found handles them well.

        I dislike the common diff/conflict resolve UIs (e.g. Jebtrains IDEs), but mostly because I've grown accustomed to git+nano. I see absolutely where they're useful for someone who prefers to work from the IDE. It just isn't my workflow. I much prefer seeing the diff on the shell, as well as using the less-commonly-implemented-in-GUI features, but I know I'm an outlier there.

        • TheAwesomeGuy47
          TheAwesomeGuy47Jan 26, 2022

          Agree.

          • kimdontdoit
            kimdontdoitJan 26, 2022

            Thanks for your input

            I'll keep git bisect in mind, I haven't heard of it before and it seems useful

            What I'll miss the most are probably git graphs to keep track (stalk) what's going on in repos (although I haven't tried to get accustomed to git log) Do you think its not useful enough or have you achieved visualizing commit history differently?

            I just copy/pasted a fancy git log --graph, and I'm not sure if my eyes like it lol

            git log graph

            • FJones
              FJonesJan 28, 2022

              I rarely use graphs, to be honest. But pure visualisation tools are also aplenty, not really a need to switch to a UI-based workflow.

              Maybe it's because I work with relatively large concurrent teams that I don't see much point in graphs, but I've never found them to convey relevant information to me. If I need to know how a commit was merged, I can either use our gitlab for the lookup, or some CLI tool that traces back (written one myself once, in fact). I'm also a huge advocate for rebase-before-merge, so our graphs often don't really tell anything. And they break apart regardless of visualization at a certain amount of concurrent branches anyway (bitbucket still can't handle more than a handful of branches properly...).

              Besides, once the merge commit is in, it's not really important to know which path a commit took, at least in my experience.

  • Liam
    LiamJan 26, 2022

    When I started coding Git CLI,
    then Gitkraken and Github Desktop.
    Finally, Git in IntelliJ and sometimes Github desktop ^^

  • АнонимJan 27, 2022

    [hidden by post author]

  • Margeaux Spring
    Margeaux SpringMar 18, 2022

    CLI FTW

Add comment