React vs. Signals: The Future of State Management?
Mridu Dixit

Mridu Dixit @mridudixit15

About: Tech Enthusiast | Frontend & Hybrid App Developer | Sharing what I learn in React, Angular, and the ever-changing world of tech

Joined:
Apr 27, 2025

React vs. Signals: The Future of State Management?

Publish Date: Aug 12
0 0

State management is the beating heart of any front-end application. The way we handle it determines not just performance, but also developer experience and scalability.

🏗 The State Management Landscape

For years, _React _and _Angular _have taken very different paths to state management:

React: Started with setState, evolved to Hooks (useState, useReducer, useContext), and now sees many developers adopting libraries like Redux, flux, or even React Signals (via third-party packages).

Angular: Relied heavily on RxJS and services for reactive state — until Signals arrived in Angular 16+ as a built-in, framework-native reactivity model.

⚛️ React's Approach

Pros:

  • Extremely flexible — choose the library that fits your needs.
  • Mature ecosystem with huge community support.

Cons:

  • No single “official” way to manage state.
  • Prone to unnecessary re-renders if not optimized.
  • Steeper learning curve when combining multiple tools.

`import { useState } from "react";

function Counter() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
setCount(c => c + 1)}>
Count: {count}

);
}`

🅰 Angular Signals

Signals in Angular are reactive primitives that store a value and notify dependents when it changes — without the boilerplate of RxJS for simple cases.

Pros:

  • Framework-native: No extra dependencies.
  • Fine-grained reactivity: Updates only where needed.
  • Simplifies complex reactive flows without RxJS overhead.

Cons:

  • Still new — ecosystem catching up.
  • Requires Angular 16+.

`import { signal } from '@angular/core';

export class CounterComponent {
count = signal(0);

increment() {
this.count.update(c => c + 1);
}
}
`

⚡ Performance

React: Relies on Virtual DOM diffing; optimizations require memo, useMemo, useCallback.
**
Angular Signals:** Tracks dependencies explicitly, skipping full component re-renders when not needed.

📊 Comparison

Feature React Hooks & State Angular Signals
Native to Framework ❌ ✅
Fine-Grained Reactivity ❌ ✅
Ecosystem Maturity ✅ (Growing)
Avoids Unnecessary Renders ❌ ✅
Learning Curve Medium Low (for Angular devs)

🏆 Final

While React remains incredibly versatile, Angular Signals represent a leap forward in state management efficiency. Their native integration, fine-grained updates, and simplified API make them a strong contender — and in my view, the better long-term bet for apps built in Angular.

💡 Best Practices

  • In React: Use memo and useCallback aggressively.
  • In Angular: Use Signals for local state, RxJS for streams.

Comments 0 total

    Add comment