React Server Components vs Angular SSR: Who’s Winning the Rendering Race?
Mridu Dixit

Mridu Dixit @mridudixit15

About: Tech Enthusiast | Frontend & Hybrid App Developer | Sharing what I learn in React, Angular, and the ever-changing world of tech

Joined:
Apr 27, 2025

React Server Components vs Angular SSR: Who’s Winning the Rendering Race?

Publish Date: Aug 24
0 0

The modern web is all about performance, SEO, and user experience. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) has become a must-have for frameworks because it ensures faster page loads, better search rankings, and smoother interactivity.

With React introducing Server Components (RSC) and Angular pushing SSR with partial hydration, developers are now asking: which one leads the future of rendering?

Let’s dive in.

⚛️ React Server Components (RSC)

React Server Components (RSC), introduced in React 18 and popularized with Next.js 13+ App Router, change the way React apps are built.

Instead of shipping everything to the client, React allows some components to render entirely on the server — sending HTML + minimal instructions to the client.

✅ Benefits:

  • Smaller bundles (less JavaScript shipped).
  • Faster initial loads since server does the heavy lifting.
  • No duplication — server-only logic stays server-side.
  • Plays nicely with streaming SSR in Next.js.
// Server Component in Next.js
// Runs only on server
export default async function Products() {
  const products = await fetch("https://api.example.com/products")
    .then(r => r.json());
  return (
    <ul>
      {products.map(p => <li key={p.id}>{p.name}</li>)}
    </ul>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

👉 RSC is a paradigm shift — developers must think in terms of what runs on the server vs. client.

🅰️ Angular SSR + Hydration

Angular’s SSR solution is Angular Universal, which has been around for years. But since Angular 16, hydration has taken center stage.

With partial hydration, Angular rehydrates only the interactive parts of the app instead of re-running the entire app on the client.

✅ Benefits:

  • Strong SEO support.
  • Faster Time-to-Interactive (TTI).
  • Bundle optimization in Angular 20 reduces payload sizes.
  • Smooth developer experience with familiar Angular patterns.

import { ngExpressEngine } from '@nguniversal/express-engine';
import { AppServerModule } from './src/main.server';

server.engine('html', ngExpressEngine({
  bootstrap: AppServerModule,
}));
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

👉 Angular’s approach is incremental and practical, making SSR easier for teams already in the Angular ecosystem.

⚡ Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature React Server Components Angular SSR + Hydration
Bundle Size Very small (ships less JS) Reduced via hydration
SEO ✅ Excellent ✅ Excellent
Ecosystem Support Next.js 13+ Angular Universal
Learning Curve Medium (new mental model) Low (familiar Angular)
Interactivity Handling Client + Server Split Partial Hydration
Future Readiness ✅ Big push in React ✅ Big push in Angular

🏆 Verdict

Both React and Angular are pushing server-first strategies, but in different ways:

React Server Components: A bigger paradigm shift, enabling truly minimal client JS. If you’re building a fresh project with Next.js 13+, this is the future-proof choice.

Angular SSR + Hydration: More practical and incremental, making SSR easier to adopt without drastic changes. Perfect for Angular-first teams focused on SEO and faster loads.

👉 In short:

Startups and greenfield projects → React RSC might give you the edge.

Established Angular ecosystems → Angular SSR is the safe, stable bet.

💡 Takeaway

The web is moving towards server-first rendering with selective hydration. React RSC is the radical innovation, Angular SSR is the reliable evolution. The choice depends on your stack and project goals.

Comments 0 total

    Add comment