By Diego Liascovich
*Full-Stack Developer | Microservices | Api | Rest | GraphQL
APIs are the backbone of modern applications — but not all APIs are created equal. In this post, I’ll walk you through the most common types of APIs: REST, GraphQL, Event-Driven APIs, gRPC, and more — explaining how they work, their pros and cons, and when to use each.
🌐 1. REST (Representational State Transfer)
📌 Overview
REST APIs use standard HTTP verbs (GET
, POST
, PUT
, DELETE
) to access resources via URLs.
✅ Best For
- CRUD applications
- Simple and predictable data access
- Public APIs
🧪 Example
GET /api/users/42
✔️ Pros
- Easy to understand and implement
- Widely supported by tools and frameworks
- Can be cached via HTTP
❌ Cons
- Overfetching/underfetching of data
- Multiple requests needed to fetch related data
🧬 2. GraphQL
📌 Overview
GraphQL uses a single endpoint and a query language that lets clients request exactly the data they need.
✅ Best For
- Complex UIs that need different data shapes
- Frontend-heavy apps (like React/Angular)
- Reducing number of API calls
🧪 Example
query {
user(id: "42") {
name
email
orders {
id
total
}
}
}
✔️ Pros
- Precise data retrieval (no overfetching)
- Strongly typed schema
- One endpoint for all data
❌ Cons
- Harder to cache with standard HTTP tools
- Learning curve for query language
- Complex server setup for some use cases
⚡ 3. Event-Driven APIs (EDA)
📌 Overview
Instead of calling APIs directly, services emit events (like order.placed
) that other services subscribe to.
✅ Best For
- Microservices architecture
- Loose coupling between services
- Asynchronous flows (notifications, logs, automation)
🧪 Example Event
{
"event": "user.created",
"data": {
"userId": "123",
"email": "user@example.com"
}
}
✔️ Pros
- Fully decoupled services
- Highly scalable and resilient
- Ideal for audit logs, triggers, and workflows
❌ Cons
- Harder to debug and trace flow
- Requires messaging infrastructure (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka)
🧠 4. gRPC (Google Remote Procedure Call)
📌 Overview
gRPC is a high-performance RPC framework using Protocol Buffers and HTTP/2.
✅ Best For
- Microservices with high throughput needs
- Internal service-to-service communication
- Real-time streaming
🧪 Example (Proto)
service UserService {
rpc GetUser (UserRequest) returns (UserResponse);
}
✔️ Pros
- Extremely fast and lightweight
- Language-neutral, auto-generates code
- Built-in streaming support
❌ Cons
- Not browser-friendly by default
- Requires
.proto
file management - More complex debugging
📡 5. WebSockets
📌 Overview
WebSockets provide bi-directional communication between client and server, ideal for real-time applications.
✅ Best For
- Chat apps
- Live dashboards/notifications
- Collaborative tools
✔️ Pros
- Low latency, real-time data
- Two-way persistent connection
❌ Cons
- More complex server/client handling
- Can’t use REST-style caching
🧓 6. SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)
📌 Overview
An older protocol using XML with a strict message format.
✅ Best For
- Legacy systems (banks, governments)
- Strong contract-based APIs
✔️ Pros
- Rigid structure and strong typing
- Works well in enterprise environments
❌ Cons
- Verbose XML
- Slower and more complex than REST/GraphQL
📊 Quick Comparison
API Type | Style | Best Use Cases | Real-Time | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|---|
REST | HTTP | CRUD, public APIs | ❌ | ⭐ |
GraphQL | Query Lang | Frontend data fetching, apps w/ UIs | ❌ | ⭐⭐ |
Events (EDA) | Messaging | Microservices, async workflows | ✅ (indirect) | ⭐⭐⭐ |
gRPC | RPC | Internal service comm, high perf | ✅ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
WebSockets | Socket-based | Live apps, chats, dashboards | ✅ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
SOAP | XML-based | Enterprise systems, strong typing | ❌ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
✅ Conclusion
There’s no “one size fits all” — choose your API type based on:
- 🚀 Performance needs
- 📦 System architecture
- 🔄 Data patterns (real-time, on-demand, batch)
- 🔧 Development environment
💬 What API style do you prefer and why? Share your experience below!
📌 Follow me for more content on architecture, Angular, and backend development!