How Apps Run: Bare Metal, VMs, and Containers Compared
Rijul Rajesh

Rijul Rajesh @rijultp

About: Dev | Technical Writer | Learner | Powered by ☕ and 🐧 Building https://hexmos.com/livereview

Joined:
Nov 12, 2023

How Apps Run: Bare Metal, VMs, and Containers Compared

Publish Date: Jun 10
15 2

When deploying applications, the choice of infrastructure matters. Whether you're building a high-performance computing system, managing enterprise workloads, or just experimenting with microservices, you’ll likely encounter three key deployment models: bare metal, virtual machines (VMs), and containers.

Each comes with its own trade-offs in terms of performance, flexibility, and isolation. Let’s break down what each approach offers and when you might choose one over the others.


1. Bare Metal: Maximum Performance, Minimal Abstraction

Bare metal refers to running applications directly on physical hardware without any virtualization layer in between.

Pros

  • Maximum performance: No overhead from virtualization or shared resources.
  • Full control: Direct access to hardware resources like CPU, memory, and storage.

Cons

  • Low flexibility: Difficult to scale dynamically or run multiple isolated workloads.
  • Slower provisioning: Setting up or reconfiguring bare metal machines takes time.
  • Underutilization risk: Unless heavily loaded, hardware resources can go unused.

Use Cases

  • High-performance computing (HPC)
  • Databases or analytics workloads with strict latency/throughput requirements
  • Scenarios requiring specific hardware control (e.g., GPU-intensive apps)

2. Virtual Machines: Strong Isolation, Flexible Workloads

Virtual machines (VMs) use a hypervisor (like VMware ESXi, KVM, or Hyper-V) to emulate physical hardware and run multiple OS instances on a single physical machine.

Pros

  • Strong isolation: Each VM has its own OS, making it secure and stable.
  • OS diversity: You can run different operating systems on the same host.
  • Mature tooling: VM ecosystems are well-developed and widely supported.

Cons

  • Resource overhead: Running full OS instances consumes more memory and CPU.
  • Slower boot times: Each VM behaves like a standalone machine.
  • Lower density: Fewer VMs can run per host compared to containers.

Use Cases

  • Legacy applications that require full OS environments
  • Mixed-OS environments (e.g., running Windows and Linux on the same host)
  • Applications needing strong security isolation between workloads

3. Containers: Lightweight and Portable

Containers (like Docker, Podman, or those managed via Kubernetes) package applications with their dependencies while sharing the host operating system kernel.

Pros

  • Fast startup: Containers spin up in seconds.
  • Lightweight: They consume fewer resources since they don’t run separate OS instances.
  • Portability: Containers can run anywhere with a compatible container engine.
  • High density: More containers can run on a host compared to VMs.

Cons

  • Weaker isolation: Containers share the OS kernel, so isolation isn’t as strong as with VMs.
  • OS uniformity: All containers must use the same kernel version as the host.
  • Security surface: Shared kernel means that kernel exploits can affect all containers.

Use Cases

  • Microservices architecture
  • CI/CD pipelines
  • Cloud-native and scalable web applications

Quick Comparison Table

Feature Bare Metal Virtual Machines Containers
Performance ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Boot Time Minutes Minutes Seconds
Isolation OS-level Strong (OS-level) Moderate (process-level)
Resource Efficiency Low Medium High
Portability Low Medium High
Use Case Fit HPC, DBs Legacy, mixed-OS apps Cloud-native apps

So, Which One Should You Use?

  • Choose bare metal if performance is your top priority and you're managing a small number of heavyweight applications.
  • Go with VMs if you need strong isolation, support for different OSes, or you're dealing with legacy applications.
  • Use containers for modern development workflows, microservices, and scalable cloud environments where speed and portability matter.

The good news is that these models aren’t mutually exclusive. Many real-world systems combine them—running containers inside VMs on top of bare metal—to balance performance, security, and flexibility.

If you're a software developer who enjoys exploring different technologies and techniques like this one, check out LiveAPI. It’s a super-convenient tool that lets you generate interactive API docs instantly.

LiveAPI helps you discover, understand and use APIs in large tech infrastructures with ease!

So, if you’re working with a codebase that lacks documentation, just use LiveAPI to generate it and save time!

You can instantly try it out here! 🚀

Comments 2 total

Add comment