1๏ธโฃ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: The ExpenseCategory
model was used as a junction table, creating a many-to-many relationship between Expense
and Category
.
2๏ธโฃ ๐จ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐
๐ถ๐๐: In most expense management systems, an ๐ฒ๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐, making ExpenseCategory
unnecessary.
3๏ธโฃ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ๐: Instead of having an indirect link via ExpenseCategory
, Expense
can have a ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ด๐ป ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ to Category
.
4๏ธโฃ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: Removing ExpenseCategory
reduces extra joins, making queries simpler and ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ.
5๏ธโฃ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: The new approach eliminates redundant code, making entity relationships ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป.
6๏ธโฃ ๐จ๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น: The Category
entity remains unchanged, storing names like "Food," "Transport," and "Entertainment" along with descriptions.
7๏ธโฃ ๐จ๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น: The Expense
entity now directly includes CategoryId
as a foreign key, simplifying data retrieval.
8๏ธโฃ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ค๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด: Fetching all expenses under a category no longer requires joining an extra table, making ๐๐๐ก๐ค ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐ค๐ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐.
9๏ธโฃ ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ผ๐ฝ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ & ๐ ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ: A cleaner design means ๐ณ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐๐ด๐, ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ด๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ when adding new features.
๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: The ExpenseCategory
model was ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ, simplifying the design while keeping it functional.
That update makes sense. afaik, junction table are meant to many-to-many relationships. And your situation seems one-to-many.