๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: ๐—˜๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น

๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: ๐—˜๐—น๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น

Publish Date: Mar 7
0 2

1๏ธโƒฃ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The ExpenseCategory model was used as a junction table, creating a many-to-many relationship between Expense and Category.

2๏ธโƒฃ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: In most expense management systems, an ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†, making ExpenseCategory unnecessary.

3๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€: Instead of having an indirect link via ExpenseCategory, Expense can have a ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜† to Category.

4๏ธโƒฃ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: Removing ExpenseCategory reduces extra joins, making queries simpler and ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ.

5๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ: The new approach eliminates redundant code, making entity relationships ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป.

6๏ธโƒฃ ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น: The Category entity remains unchanged, storing names like "Food," "Transport," and "Entertainment" along with descriptions.

7๏ธโƒฃ ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น: The Expense entity now directly includes CategoryId as a foreign key, simplifying data retrieval.

8๏ธโƒฃ ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: Fetching all expenses under a category no longer requires joining an extra table, making ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ค ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ค๐—Ÿ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜.

9๏ธโƒฃ ๐—™๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ & ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ: A cleaner design means ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ด๐˜€, ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† when adding new features.

๐Ÿ”Ÿ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: The ExpenseCategory model was ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ, simplifying the design while keeping it functional.

Comments 2 total

  • William Cunha Cardoso
    William Cunha CardosoApr 29, 2025

    That update makes sense. afaik, junction table are meant to many-to-many relationships. And your situation seems one-to-many.

Add comment